Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/36155| Author(s): | Oksanen, A. Osma, T. Heiskari, M. Cvetkovic, A. Ruokosuo, E. S. Koike, M. Arriaga, P. Savolainen, L. |
| Date: | 2026 |
| Title: | Mapping AI learning readiness self-efficacy worldwide: Scale validation and cross-continental patterns |
| Journal title: | Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans |
| Volume: | 7 |
| Reference: | Oksanen, A., Osma, T., Heiskari, M., Cvetkovic, A., Ruokosuo, E. S., Koike, M., Arriaga, P., & Savolainen, L. (2026). Mapping AI learning readiness self-efficacy worldwide: Scale validation and cross-continental patterns. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 7, Article 100251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2026.100251 |
| ISSN: | 2949-8821 |
| DOI (Digital Object Identifier): | 10.1016/j.chbah.2026.100251 |
| Keywords: | Artificial intelligence Learning Self-efficacy Scale Survey Cross-national |
| Abstract: | In today's world, knowing how to use artificial intelligence (AI) technologies is becoming an essential skill. While methods for measuring the perceived efficacy of AI use are emerging, brief measures of users' self-evaluated learning and self-efficacy regarding AI use are still lacking. This study aimed to validate the five-item AI Learning Readiness Self-Efficacy (AILRSE) scale and examine cross-national differences between 12 countries on six continents. We used large-scale, adult population samples from Australia, Brazil, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Poland, Portugal, South Africa, and the United States collected in 2024–2025 (N = 20,173), enabling both cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis. Scale validation involved confirmatory factor analysis and measurement invariance testing across countries and over time. The results supported a one-factor structure with high internal consistency and scalar invariance across countries as well as strict invariance in Finnish cross-sectional and longitudinal data. AI positivity emerged as the strongest predictor of AILRSE-5 scores across all models, followed by younger age and more frequent use of text-to-text AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT, Copilot). Education and gender effects were small and context dependent. The findings indicate that AILRSE-5 is a brief, reliable, and valid tool for assessing self-efficacy in AI learning readiness. Its invariance across diverse national contexts supports its applicability in cross-cultural research, while its longitudinal invariance suggests stability over time. Furthermore, our results provide rare cross-national evidence on the individual factors shaping AI learning readiness self-efficacy. The study advances understanding of how people adapt to the rapidly evolving AI landscape. |
| Peerreviewed: | yes |
| Access type: | Open Access |
| Appears in Collections: | CIS-RI - Artigos em revistas científicas internacionais com arbitragem científica |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| article_115808.pdf | 675,19 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.












