Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10071/31940
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCurado, M. T.-
dc.contributor.authorResende, R.-
dc.contributor.authorRato, V. M.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-26T14:59:17Z-
dc.date.available2024-06-26T14:59:17Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.citationCurado, M. T., Resende, R., & Rato, V. M. (2024). Circular economy: Current view from the construction industry based on published definitions. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 20(1), Article 2364954. http://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2024.2364954-
dc.identifier.issn1548-7733-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/31940-
dc.description.abstractThe third decade of this millennium has seen a growing interest in using the circular economy (CE) concept to achieve the broad goals of sustainable development. Still, like the latter, the former notion has different meanings to different audiences in general and in the construction sector in particular. This Brief Report aims to assess how the construction sector regards the CE concept, or more precisely, how it defines it. This work draws on previous research by Kirchherr et al. (2017), applying their generic framework to the construction sector by dividing the CE into its main components and subcomponents and quantifying the extent of their acceptance. The main contribution of this work lies in establishing a benchmark for comparison with other industries and across time within the construction industry. We start with an analysis of the available literature and then focus on how the reviewed works perceive the scope of CE, its deployment systems, enablers, and its relationship with sustainable development. Our results confirm that the sector is embracing the linkage of CE to sustainable development while revealing a lesser concern for CE’s social and future dimensions. This Brief Report also shows that the understanding of CE actions in terms of a hierarchy is still limited. However, its three main components (Reduce, Reuse, Recycle) are almost universally espoused, with the Recover component is mentioned by just over half of the reviewed works.eng
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherRoutledge/Taylor and Francis-
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDP%2F04466%2F2020/PT-
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/6817 - DCRRNI ID/UIDB%2F04466%2F2020/PT-
dc.rightsopenAccess-
dc.subjectCircular economyeng
dc.subjectDefinitioneng
dc.subjectSustainabilityeng
dc.subjectGreen buildingseng
dc.subjectConstructioneng
dc.subjectBuilt environmenteng
dc.titleCircular economy: Current view from the construction industry based on published definitionseng
dc.typearticle-
dc.peerreviewedyes-
dc.volume20-
dc.number1-
dc.date.updated2024-06-26T15:57:29Z-
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/15487733.2024.2364954-
dc.subject.fosDomínio/Área Científica::Ciências Naturais::Ciências da Terra e do Ambientepor
dc.subject.fosDomínio/Área Científica::Engenharia e Tecnologia::Engenharia Civilpor
iscte.subject.odsIndústria, inovação e infraestruturaspor
iscte.subject.odsCidades e comunidades sustentáveispor
iscte.subject.odsAção climáticapor
iscte.identifier.cienciahttps://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/id/ci-pub-104282-
iscte.journalSustainability: Science, Practice and Policy-
Appears in Collections:ISTAR-RI - Artigos em revistas científicas internacionais com arbitragem científica

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
article_104282.pdf2,16 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


FacebookTwitterDeliciousLinkedInDiggGoogle BookmarksMySpaceOrkut
Formato BibTex mendeley Endnote Logotipo do DeGóis Logotipo do Orcid 

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.